Kensington Runestone

Kensington Runestone: Unraveling the Viking Mystery of America

The Kensington Runestone, a slab of greywacke covered in runic inscriptions, has puzzled historians and enthusiasts for over a century. Discovered in 1898 by Swedish-American farmer Olof Öhman near Kensington, Minnesota, the stone’s inscription claims to be a record of Norse explorers from 1362 — over a century before Columbus's arrival in the Americas. The authenticity of the stone has been a matter of intense debate, with arguments on both sides presenting compelling evidence.

Description and Inscription

The stone, measuring 31 inches in height, 16 inches in width, and 6 inches in thickness, bears an inscription of 30 lines on its face and a shorter message on its side. The text, written in runes, tells the story of eight Goths and 22 Norwegians who ventured westward from Vinland (a Norse colony in North America) on an expedition. According to the inscription, ten of their party were killed by “red men,” a term presumably referring to Native Americans. The remaining explorers supposedly buried the stone to commemorate the tragedy and to serve as a record for any who might find it.

Controversy and Early Reactions

From the moment of its discovery, the Kensington Runestone sparked controversy. Linguists and historians quickly divided into two camps: those who believed in its authenticity and those who condemned it as a modern forgery. Critics argued that the language and runes on the stone were anachronistic, incorporating forms not documented until centuries after 1362. Some pointed to Öhman’s Scandinavian heritage and speculated that he or someone in his community might have carved the stone to gain attention or as a hoax. The Minnesota Historical Society initially rejected the stone as a forgery, a stance that resonated with most academics at the time.

Arguments for Authenticity

Supporters of the stone’s authenticity, however, offer counterarguments. They assert that the inscription’s mix of runic styles could be explained by the evolving nature of the Norse language and the limited understanding of medieval Scandinavian scripts in the 19th century. Scholars such as Hjalmar Holand, who championed the stone in the early 20th century, argued that the historical context made sense if one considered possible Norse exploration deep into the North American continent. Holand’s research also pointed to other Norse artifacts and geographical names in North America, suggesting a broader scope of exploration than traditionally accepted.

Geological Evidence

Another layer of the mystery involves the physical aspects of the stone itself. Geologist Scott Wolter conducted a microscopic examination of the runes in the 2000s and concluded that the weathering patterns indicated significant age, supporting the idea that the inscription was not a modern creation. Wolter’s findings, however, have been met with skepticism from mainstream academics, who argue that his methods and conclusions lack peer-reviewed validation.

Historical Implications

The broader implications of the Kensington Runestone’s authenticity are significant. If genuine, it would challenge the accepted timeline of European exploration in North America, suggesting that Norse expeditions penetrated much further inland than previously thought. It would also prompt a reevaluation of the interactions between Norse explorers and Native American tribes, potentially rewriting a chapter of pre-Columbian history.

Enduring Mystery

Despite over a century of scrutiny, no consensus has emerged. The stone remains on display at the Runestone Museum in Alexandria, Minnesota, a symbol of mystery and a reminder of the complex interplay between legend, history, and national pride. The Kensington Runestone continues to captivate the imagination of historians, archaeologists, and enthusiasts, standing as a monument to the enduring allure of history’s unsolved mysteries.

Back to 100 World Mysteries